CELEBRITIES
REPORT: Amnesty International Submits Petition Seeking Possible Imprisonment and Asset Freezes for Elon Musk Over Alleged Foreign Election Interference, Also Calls for Donald Trump’s Impeachment and Arrest, Citing Allegations of War Crimes, ICE Brutality, Free Speech Abuse, and Epstein-Related Concern
In a stunning development shaking global political and tech circles, Amnesty International has reportedly filed a sweeping petition urging international courts and allied governments to consider imprisonment and asset freezes for billionaire Elon Musk, citing allegations of foreign election interference and unlawful international influence operations.
According to preliminary reports, the petition also calls for the impeachment and arrest of former U.S. President Donald Trump, accusing him of war crimes, ICE brutality, free speech violations, and potential connections to Epstein-linked misconduct.
Sources close to Amnesty’s legal division say the petition was submitted to multiple international bodies — including the International Criminal Court (ICC) and United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) — demanding urgent review of Musk’s alleged coordination with foreign actors to sway global elections through social media manipulation, digital propaganda, and AI-driven disinformation campaigns.
The document reportedly cites “systematic abuse of power” and “intentional destabilization of democratic processes”, linking Musk’s platforms to amplified election interference efforts and disinformation flows targeting European and African nations.
Meanwhile, the call for Trump’s prosecution has reignited fierce debate in Washington. Amnesty’s dossier accuses Trump-era policies of “inhumane ICE practices amounting to state-sponsored brutality” and “gross violations of human rights under international law.”
Human rights experts describe the petition as “unprecedented in scope,” arguing that it blurs the traditional lines between tech accountability and political justice. However, both Musk and Trump’s allies have denounced the move as a “politically motivated smear campaign” timed to disrupt U.S. domestic and foreign politics.
If accepted for review, the petition could set off one of the most consequential human rights and legal battles in modern history — testing not only the limits of global accountability but also the reach of international law over powerful political and technological figures.