Connect with us

CELEBRITIES

Memo to Edmonton Oilers: No team has won Stanley Cup with a player earning more than $10 million What does this mean for Edmonton Oilers, Draisaitl and McDavid?

Published

on

 

The NHL has had many great players, and in the past 15 seasons many of them made more than $10 million per year in salary.

 

 

But for all these great players have brought to their teams, no NHL team has yet won the Stanley Cup in the league’s salary cap era, 2005-24, with a player on its roster making more than $10 million per season.

My Cult of Hockey colleague Bruce McCurdy brought up this fact in our new podcast on Edmonton’s contract negotiations with Leon Draisaitl and, shortly, with Connor McDavid.

In recent years, Stanley Cup winning teams have had three players who made $10 million on the nose, Sergei Bobrovsky and Alexander Barkov in Florida and Jack Eichel in Vegas, but no team has gone all the way with a player making more than that.

Fourteen players made more than $10 million in cap hit in the NHL last season, with Auston Matthews leading the way at $13.25 million. Toronto had two other players in this group, John Tavares at $11 million and Mitch Marner at $10.9 million. But Toronto, once again, failed to win even one ground in the playoffs.

Drew Doughty of the Los Angeles Kings made $11 million last year, ninth most in the NHL. But his Kings were again bounced in the first round of the NHL playoffs.

Indeed, since Doughty’s deal jumped from $7 million to $11 million in the 2019-20 season, the Kings have failed to make the playoffs twice and been bounced in the first round three times.

The second great Kings player, Anze Kopitar, went from $6.8 million to $10 million a year in the 2015-16 season. In the four seasons before Kopitar’s raise kicked in, the Kings won two Stanley Cups. They did not win a round after Kopitar’s big salary boost happened.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Last week I wrote of another such example, how the Chicago Blackhawks won three Cups in six years when star players Jonanthan Toews and Patrick Kane were on more modest deals, but despite Kane and Toews being near the top of their games, that team never won another first round in the playoffs after their new deals at $10.5 million per season each kicked in for the 2015-16 season.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Last week I wrote of another such example, how the Chicago Blackhawks won three Cups in six years when star players Jonanthan Toews and Patrick Kane were on more modest deals, but despite Kane and Toews being near the top of their games, that team never won another first round in the playoffs after their new deals at $10.5 million per season each kicked in for the 2015-16 season.

What does this mean for Edmonton Oilers, Draisaitl and McDavid?

It’s evident that both Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl will sign new NHL deals for more than $10 million per season. But if they decide to both sign in Edmonton, what cap hit would be both reasonable for them but also give the Oilers a solid chance of having enough cap dollars to compete each year for the Stanley Cup?

To figure this out, I looked at each team that won the Stanley Cup in the cap-era to see what percentage of the ever-increasing salary cap their top two players have commanded.

That average turned out to be 23.1 per cent of the cap in a given year, with Scott Niedermayer and Chris Pronger of Anaheim taking up the greatest percentage, 29.5 per cent for the 2006-07 Anaheim Ducks, and Ryan 0’Reilly and Alex Pietrangelo taking up the lowest percentage, just 17.6 per cent for the 2018-19 St. Louis Blues.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

The Florida Panthers, with their two $10 million players. designated 24 per cent of the cap to Bobrovsky and Barkov, just about the average for NHL Cup-winners. By comparison, McDavid and Darnell Nurse, Edmonton’s two highest paid players, took up 26 per cent of Edmonton’s cap, which is higher than all but two Cup winners in the cap era.

Of course an NHL team could defy this trend. The Oilers could pay McDavid $15 million on his new deal and Draisaitl $14 million per year on his and still win the Stanley Cup in 2026-27, when I guesstimate the salary cap will be about $96 million. That would be 30.2 per cent of the cap going to McDavid and Draisaitl.

For McDavid and Draisaitl’s contracts to be in line with previous salaries earned by the top two highest paid players on Cup winners, McDavid would have to stick to his current salary of $12.5 million, with Draisaitl getting a boost to that same $12.5 million per season. That would have the two getting 26.3 per cent of the cap in 2025-26 and 25 per cent of the cap in 2026-27. Those are salaries at a level that the Oilers could work with to have a solid shot at the Stanley Cup.

But if McDavid and Draisaitl take home 30 per cent or 29 per cent or even 28 per cent of the Oilers’ total cap, it’s going to be difficult for Edmonton to go all the way, at least if the history of Cup winners is a guide, and if my singular focus on the salaries of the top two players is reasonable.

By the way, if McDavid and Draisaitl are looking for inspiration in this regard, they might want to talk to Sidney Crosby. When Crosby won his first Cup in Pittsburgh in 2009, he took home $8.7 million, 15.3 per cent of the cap of that time. But in his next long-term deal, Crosby stuck with that $8.7 million per year, turning his back on at least two or three million dollars a year if he’d done what most players would do in that situation.

Crosby has earned less in salary because of it. But his lower salary also helped Pittsburgh have the cap space to win two more Stanley Cups in 2016 and 2017.

Did he make the right call? You’d have to ask Crosby, though it may be impossible to quantify.

What’s the going rate for an NHL superstar? $13 or $14 million a year these days.

What’s the value of winning the Cup? Priceless.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CELEBRITIES1 hour ago

““BEATEN, BEATEN — PAY NOW!” – Jason Kelce Sues Pete Hegseth and Network for $50 MILLION After Shocking On-Air Attack Read more⤵️

CELEBRITIES2 hours ago

Epstein’s former accuser alleges the existence of recordings that she says could force Donald Trump to step down from office, a claim that has sparked renewed scrutiny and debate around Epstein’s network and its connections.

CELEBRITIES3 hours ago

America has lost a titan in the struggle for civil rights and racial justice. From his days at the side of Dr. King, to his moral leadership in this century, Rev. Jesse Jackson, Sr. spent his life pushing our nation closer to its own ideal. As we pray for his family and loved ones, we should also mark his passing by recommitting ourselves to the vision of a fully free and just society.

CELEBRITIES4 hours ago

🚨 CANADA LINES UP NEW FOOD BUYERS AS TRADE TENSIONS RISE 🌾🇨🇦🇺🇸 Amid renewed U.S. trade pressure, Canada has moved to diversify its agricultural exports — securing alternative international buyers and reducing exposure to potential disruption. Rather than waiting on negotiations, Ottawa accelerated outreach to global markets, a shift analysts say strengthens Canada’s leverage while stabilizing domestic producers. Investors are watching closely. Market strategists note that when food supply chains move, capital moves with them — and diversification tends to outlast political flare-ups. What began as a threat may now be speeding up a longer-term realignment in North American agriculture. Full story in comments 👇

NFL8 hours ago

REPORT: The Supreme Court Blocks Donald Trump’s Proposal to Slash SSI and Veterans Benefits to Redirect Billions to DHS as Homeland Security Shutdown Deepens⤵️

CELEBRITIES8 hours ago

🚨 Trump Faces Public Humiliation as Court Orders Seizure of His Properties In a shocking legal development, Federal Judge Arthur Engoron has authorized the seizure of Donald Trump’s most prized properties, including Trump Tower, to satisfy a $464 million judgment. This unprecedented court order comes after Trump’s repeated refusal to post the required appeal bond. With the potential liquidation of his properties, including his iconic Manhattan real estate, the stakes for Trump’s business empire and political future have never been higher. In this video, we break down the legal implications, Trump’s defiant response, and how this massive legal setback could affect his 2024 campaign and legacy. 👉 Full story ⤵️

CELEBRITIES14 hours ago

JUST IN: Taylor Swift’s Bold “No Kings” Message to Donald Trump on Presidents Day Sparks Nationwide Debate and Social Media Frenzy.

CELEBRITIES14 hours ago

BREAKING: Kristi Noem’s Department of Homeland Security is on the brink of a department-wide shutdown as no spending package has been passed. Good, just shut it down!!

CELEBRITIES20 hours ago

Recently, social media posts and popular online threads have claimed that an alleged victim associated with Jeffrey Epstein has come forward saying recordings exist of former U.S. President Donald Trump that would be so damaging they would force him to resign from office. These posts, including widely shared threads on Reddit, have circulated with high engagement and comments suggesting various theories about what such “tapes” might show — but they are unverified claims without confirmed sources or evidence from mainstream reporting or released legal documents. Official news reporting on the Epstein files — the vast trove of documents, photos, and videos recently being released by the U.S. Department of Justice — does confirm that the files contain references to Trump and his past relationship with Epstein, including emails and mentions in documents. However, the Justice Department itself has said that many sensationalist claims about Trump in these files are unfounded or unverified, and there has been no credible confirmation of explicit “tapes” of Trump that would compel resignation. Trump’s connections to Epstein during the 1990s and 2000s have been acknowledged in released correspondence, but nothing has been publicly verified that rises to the level of forcing a resignation. The discussions online about “tapes” are part of a broader mix of rumors, speculation, and politically charged narratives that frequently surface around both the Epstein case and Trump’s presidency. Without confirmation from respected news outlets or direct evidence from the released documents themselves, such claims should be treated as unverified and speculative, not established fact. As of now, major outlets continue reporting on the Epstein files with caution, distinguishing between documented content and unproven allegations circulating on forums and social platforms. #fblifestyle #EpsteinFiles #DonaldTrump

CELEBRITIES21 hours ago

Bill Clinton’s Potential Testimony on Trump-Epstein Ties Sparks Debate

CELEBRITIES1 day ago

TAYLOR SWIFT JUST BROKE DOWN LIVE ON TV: CALLS T.R.U.M.P “A VICIOUS OLD BASTARD BLEEDING THE UNITED STATES” OVER THE “BORN IN AMERICA” LAW….. full details ⤵️

CELEBRITIES1 day ago

🚨 BREAKING: It wasn’t a heated ambush — it was a quiet correction that shifted the tone instantly. A former White House figure appeared visibly unsettled after a reporter fact-checked his statements in real time during a public exchange, turning what began as a routine moment into a tense spotlight on accuracy. Notably, the fact-check itself was measured and grounded in publicly available information. There were no raised voices at first, no dramatic accusations — just a direct request for clarification. But as the questioning continued, the official pushed back and attempted to pivot, a reaction observers say only intensified attention on the discrepancy unfolding live. This wasn’t merely an awkward exchange — it became a credibility test. In an era where claims can be verified instantly, real-time corrections carry weight. As clips circulate and debate builds online, many are watching closely to see how moments like this shape public trust — and whether similar confrontations will become more common. 👇

Copyright © 2024 UKtalkin