Connect with us

CELEBRITIES

Memo to Edmonton Oilers: No team has won Stanley Cup with a player earning more than $10 million What does this mean for Edmonton Oilers, Draisaitl and McDavid?

Published

on

 

The NHL has had many great players, and in the past 15 seasons many of them made more than $10 million per year in salary.

 

 

But for all these great players have brought to their teams, no NHL team has yet won the Stanley Cup in the league’s salary cap era, 2005-24, with a player on its roster making more than $10 million per season.

My Cult of Hockey colleague Bruce McCurdy brought up this fact in our new podcast on Edmonton’s contract negotiations with Leon Draisaitl and, shortly, with Connor McDavid.

In recent years, Stanley Cup winning teams have had three players who made $10 million on the nose, Sergei Bobrovsky and Alexander Barkov in Florida and Jack Eichel in Vegas, but no team has gone all the way with a player making more than that.

Fourteen players made more than $10 million in cap hit in the NHL last season, with Auston Matthews leading the way at $13.25 million. Toronto had two other players in this group, John Tavares at $11 million and Mitch Marner at $10.9 million. But Toronto, once again, failed to win even one ground in the playoffs.

Drew Doughty of the Los Angeles Kings made $11 million last year, ninth most in the NHL. But his Kings were again bounced in the first round of the NHL playoffs.

Indeed, since Doughty’s deal jumped from $7 million to $11 million in the 2019-20 season, the Kings have failed to make the playoffs twice and been bounced in the first round three times.

The second great Kings player, Anze Kopitar, went from $6.8 million to $10 million a year in the 2015-16 season. In the four seasons before Kopitar’s raise kicked in, the Kings won two Stanley Cups. They did not win a round after Kopitar’s big salary boost happened.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Last week I wrote of another such example, how the Chicago Blackhawks won three Cups in six years when star players Jonanthan Toews and Patrick Kane were on more modest deals, but despite Kane and Toews being near the top of their games, that team never won another first round in the playoffs after their new deals at $10.5 million per season each kicked in for the 2015-16 season.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Last week I wrote of another such example, how the Chicago Blackhawks won three Cups in six years when star players Jonanthan Toews and Patrick Kane were on more modest deals, but despite Kane and Toews being near the top of their games, that team never won another first round in the playoffs after their new deals at $10.5 million per season each kicked in for the 2015-16 season.

What does this mean for Edmonton Oilers, Draisaitl and McDavid?

It’s evident that both Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl will sign new NHL deals for more than $10 million per season. But if they decide to both sign in Edmonton, what cap hit would be both reasonable for them but also give the Oilers a solid chance of having enough cap dollars to compete each year for the Stanley Cup?

To figure this out, I looked at each team that won the Stanley Cup in the cap-era to see what percentage of the ever-increasing salary cap their top two players have commanded.

That average turned out to be 23.1 per cent of the cap in a given year, with Scott Niedermayer and Chris Pronger of Anaheim taking up the greatest percentage, 29.5 per cent for the 2006-07 Anaheim Ducks, and Ryan 0’Reilly and Alex Pietrangelo taking up the lowest percentage, just 17.6 per cent for the 2018-19 St. Louis Blues.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

The Florida Panthers, with their two $10 million players. designated 24 per cent of the cap to Bobrovsky and Barkov, just about the average for NHL Cup-winners. By comparison, McDavid and Darnell Nurse, Edmonton’s two highest paid players, took up 26 per cent of Edmonton’s cap, which is higher than all but two Cup winners in the cap era.

Of course an NHL team could defy this trend. The Oilers could pay McDavid $15 million on his new deal and Draisaitl $14 million per year on his and still win the Stanley Cup in 2026-27, when I guesstimate the salary cap will be about $96 million. That would be 30.2 per cent of the cap going to McDavid and Draisaitl.

For McDavid and Draisaitl’s contracts to be in line with previous salaries earned by the top two highest paid players on Cup winners, McDavid would have to stick to his current salary of $12.5 million, with Draisaitl getting a boost to that same $12.5 million per season. That would have the two getting 26.3 per cent of the cap in 2025-26 and 25 per cent of the cap in 2026-27. Those are salaries at a level that the Oilers could work with to have a solid shot at the Stanley Cup.

But if McDavid and Draisaitl take home 30 per cent or 29 per cent or even 28 per cent of the Oilers’ total cap, it’s going to be difficult for Edmonton to go all the way, at least if the history of Cup winners is a guide, and if my singular focus on the salaries of the top two players is reasonable.

By the way, if McDavid and Draisaitl are looking for inspiration in this regard, they might want to talk to Sidney Crosby. When Crosby won his first Cup in Pittsburgh in 2009, he took home $8.7 million, 15.3 per cent of the cap of that time. But in his next long-term deal, Crosby stuck with that $8.7 million per year, turning his back on at least two or three million dollars a year if he’d done what most players would do in that situation.

Crosby has earned less in salary because of it. But his lower salary also helped Pittsburgh have the cap space to win two more Stanley Cups in 2016 and 2017.

Did he make the right call? You’d have to ask Crosby, though it may be impossible to quantify.

What’s the going rate for an NHL superstar? $13 or $14 million a year these days.

What’s the value of winning the Cup? Priceless.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CELEBRITIES4 hours ago

🚨 TRUMP BLINDSIDED BY $100 BILLION BRIDGE SCANDAL — CARNEY’S EXPOSÉ REVEALED ⚡🇨🇦🇺🇸 In a shocking political rupture overnight, reports emerged of a meeting between the owner of the Ambassador Bridge and the U.S. Commerce Secretary just before President Trump’s threat to block the Gordie Howe International Bridge. This publicly funded project, designed to ease billions in annual cross-border trade, now faces questions over potential private influence on policy. U.S. lawmakers are demanding records amid concerns for trade stability and infrastructure agreements with Canada. The internet can’t stop talking… catch the full explosive clips before they disappear!…..👇 Full details ⤵️⤵️

CELEBRITIES9 hours ago

JUST IN: Amnesty International Submits Petition Seeking Possible Imprisonment and Asset Freezes for Elon Musk Over Alleged Foreign Election Interference, Also Calls for Donald Trump’s Impeachment and Arrest, Citing Allegations of War Crimes, ICE Brutality, Free Speech Abuse, and Epstein-Related Concern

CELEBRITIES9 hours ago

🚨 BREAKING: A former White House figure reportedly reacted with visible frustration after the governor of New Jersey announced a move to restrict the use of certain state-owned properties by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement>—a decision that immediately ignited a political firestorm. Governor Phil Murphy> framed the policy as a matter of state authority and administrative control, while critics argue it sends a broader message about federal-state tensions over immigration enforcement. The timing has raised eyebrows, especially as immigration remains a flashpoint issue nationwide. This isn’t just a policy tweak—it’s a symbolic clash. When a state takes a public stand involving federal agencies, the ripple effects go far beyond property access. Now many are watching to see whether this escalates into a larger legal showdown—or becomes the next defining battle in the immigration debate. 👇

CELEBRITIES9 hours ago

According to reports, the Special Prosecutor testified that the evidence met criminal standards in the investigations into Trump. Raise your hand if you believe Trump deserves impeachment.

CELEBRITIES10 hours ago

BREAKING: FIGHT BACK! California prepares a massive lawsuit against the Trump administration to challenge RFK Jr.’s dangerous changes to childhood vaccine recommendations.

CELEBRITIES11 hours ago

🚨 BREAKING 🇺🇸 🚨 U.S. Senators have officially called for President Donald Trump’s removal from office under the 25th Amendment.

CELEBRITIES15 hours ago

🚨 TRUMP ON EDGE — “They’ll Impeach Me Again!” His warning sends waves through D.C. as Democrats clash over strategy. ⚖️ Will they focus on impeachment or America’s economy? 💬 Drop your opinion in the comments now! #PoliticalStorm #ImpeachmentTalk #FBTrending

CELEBRITIES18 hours ago

🚨 BREAKING: It wasn’t a quiet gathering — it was a surge of voices that quickly drew national attention. Large-scale protests calling for impeachment have erupted in multiple locations, placing renewed political pressure on Donald Trump as demonstrators demand accountability. Notably, organizers framed the events around constitutional process rather than partisan spectacle. While some critics describe the demonstrations as politically motivated, participants insist their concerns center on governance and oversight. Analysts say the scale and coordination of the protests — more than any single slogan — is what has intensified the conversation. This wasn’t just about turnout — it was about momentum. In today’s political climate, sustained public demonstrations often signal broader undercurrents within the electorate. As images circulate and reactions ripple across media platforms, many are watching closely to see whether these protests translate into formal action — or remain a powerful symbolic statement. 👇

CELEBRITIES20 hours ago

🚨 JUST IN 🇨🇦🇺🇸 🚨Canada is planning to halt purchases of U.S. defense systems, including the F-35, THAAD, and Golden Dome, and instead pursue domestic production or cooperation with China, the EU, and Sweden. U.S. could face losses of up to $100 billion in defense deals tied to the move.

CELEBRITIES1 day ago

JUST IN: Stephen Colbert Launches $750 Million Federal Lawsuit Against FCC and Donald Trump in Punitive and Compensatory Damages , Accusing Trump of Orchestrating Brazen Censorship and a Direct Assault on Press Freedom and Free Speech by Forcing CBS to Pull Interview with Texas Senate Hopeful James Talarico

CELEBRITIES1 day ago

UPDATE: Supreme Court Blocks President Donald Trump’s Proposal to Slash SSI and Veterans Benefits to Redirect Billions to DHS as Homeland Security Shutdown Deepens…. Full details ⤵️

CELEBRITIES2 days ago

““BEATEN, BEATEN — PAY NOW!” – Jason Kelce Sues Pete Hegseth and Network for $50 MILLION After Shocking On-Air Attack Read more⤵️

Copyright © 2024 UKtalkin