NFL
JUST IN: Supreme Court Officially Summons President Donald Trump After He Refuses to Answer Federal Inquiries and Multiple Lawsuits, Including a $10 Billion Case Filed by the National Trust for Historic Preservation Over the Illegal Demolition of the White House East Wing
JUST IN: Supreme Court Officially Summons President Donald Trump After He Refuses to Answer Federal Inquiries and Multiple Lawsuits, Including a $10 Billion Case Filed by the National Trust for Historic Preservation Over the Illegal Demolition of the White House East Wing
Recent posts circulating online claiming that the U.S. Supreme Court has officially summoned President Donald Trump after he “refused to answer federal inquiries” and that the National Trust for Historic Preservation filed a $10 billion lawsuit over the “illegal demolition” of the White House East Wing are misleading and unfounded. There is no credible evidence that the Supreme Court has issued such an order, nor that a $10 billion suit over demolition has been filed with the nation’s highest court. Independent fact-checking has confirmed that these claims are baseless misinformation. �
news.meaww.com
🔍 What Is Actually Happening
🏛️ Federal Lawsuit Over White House East Wing Demolition
• A real lawsuit has been filed in federal district court (not the Supreme Court) by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, a congressionally chartered nonprofit focused on protecting historic sites. �
The Independent +1
• That lawsuit challenges President Trump’s White House ballroom project, which involves demolition of the historic East Wing to build a new 90,000-square-foot ballroom. Plaintiffs argue the administration failed to complete required federal reviews, such as environmental assessments and public comment periods, before beginning demolition and construction. �
The Independent
• The Trust’s complaint seeks a court order to halt further work until legally mandated design reviews, environmental assessments, and congressional oversight occur. �
The Independent
• The legal action focuses on compliance with statutes like the Administrative Procedure Act and the National Environmental Policy Act, and whether the president may proceed without express congressional approval for a major federal construction project. �
https://www.fox8live.com
🧱 No $10 Billion Lawsuit and No Supreme Court Summons
• The claim that the National Trust filed a $10 billion lawsuit is not supported by any credible legal filings or reporting — court documents and credible news coverage show no such figure or case has been filed. �
news.meaww.com
• Similarly, the U.S. Supreme Court has not summoned President Trump in connection with this dispute or any related “refusal to answer federal inquiries.” The claim appears to stem from misinformation and fabricated reports circulating on social media and fringe websites. �
news.meaww.com
🧠 Why This Matters
• The White House and its grounds are among the most historically significant properties in the United States. How and whether they can be altered — especially without public review — raises constitutional and statutory questions about presidential authority, historic preservation law, and separation of powers. �
The Independent
• The ongoing legal battle is likely to shape precedent on how federal historic, environmental, and planning laws apply to executive branch projects. It’s a high-stakes case — but so far it is unfolding in U.S. District Court, not the Supreme Court. �
The Independent