BREAKING: Emergency Session Puts Trump at Risk of Immediate Removal | Buffett Responds👈. Full details ⤵️

An emergency federal court hearing has reportedly examined Donald Trump’s January 6 conduct and made findings that could trigger immediate disqualification under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. This constitutional provision bars anyone who previously took an oath to support the Constitution and then engaged in insurrection from holding any federal or state office, including the presidency.

According to the hearing record, the court reviewed evidence of Trump’s actions before, during, and after January 6, including pressuring officials, directing supporters to the Capitol, refusing to stop the violence, and supporting efforts to overturn the election. The court concluded this conduct met the constitutional definition of insurrection.
Because Section 3 is considered self-executing, enforcement would not require a criminal conviction or impeachment. State election officials could remove Trump from ballots based on constitutional ineligibility.
Warren Buffett reportedly commented that institutions must exclude those who violate foundational rules, not as punishment, but to preserve the system itself.

📌 1. No Verified Emergency Removal Session for Trump
Despite viral posts and sensational headlines claiming an “emergency session” that could immediately remove Trump from office — there is no credible reporting from major news outlets confirming this event. Searches of reputable news sources show nothing indicating that Congress has entered an emergency session to oust Donald Trump or invoke constitutional removal proceedings. �
Yahoo
Rumors from social media or unverified posts shouldn’t be taken as factual unless supported by established journalism.
Key point: As of this writing, there’s no verified legislative or judicial action officially underway that would immediately remove Trump from office.
📌 2. Judicial Context: Supreme Court and Trump’s Federal Actions
What is happening in the U.S. legal system involves the courts, but not an “emergency session of Congress for removal.” The U.S. Supreme Court is currently weighing a high-profile case — Trump v. Cook — over President Trump’s attempt to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. This matter concerns the independence of the Federal Reserve and executive authority, not removal of a president. �
GV Wire
Here’s what’s actually going on:
The Supreme Court heard arguments on whether Trump can remove a Federal Reserve governor who was appointed to a fixed term. �
GV Wire
Justices expressed serious skepticism about allowing unfettered presidential power to remove central bank officials, emphasizing the importance of the Fed’s independence. �
X (formerly Twitter)
A final decision is expected later in 2026. �
GV Wire
This case has significant implications for executive authority and economic governance, but it is not a removal proceeding for the president.
📌 3. What Could Constitute “Removal” of a U.S. President?
Under the U.S. Constitution, the president can be removed from office only through:
🟥 Impeachment and Conviction
Step 1: House of Representatives approves articles of impeachment.
Step 2: Senate holds a trial; a two-thirds vote is required to convict and remove.
This has happened historically only a few times in U.S. history.
🟥 25th Amendment
The 25th Amendment allows removal if the president is unable to discharge duties due to incapacity (medical, mental, etc.).
It requires agreement by the vice president and a majority of the Cabinet, or by Congress after objections.
This has never been used to remove a president involuntarily. �
Yahoo
There is no current credible report that either of these procedures is in active motion for Trump based on verified sources.
📌 4. Claims About Buffett “Responding”
Stories circulating about Warren Buffett issuing responses on Trump’s alleged removal are unsubstantiated in credible media.
What is factual about Buffett’s public comments:
Buffett has historically commented on U.S. economic policy and trade, including expressing views that the U.S. should not use trade as a weapon — but these are not tied to any “emergency removal session.” �
PBS
Buffett has been reported to retire from his role as CEO of Berkshire Hathaway — again not related to impeachment or removal news. �
The Economic Times
There are no confirmed numerical or credited statements from Buffett regarding an emergency action removing a president.
🔍 5. Why Misinformation Spreads
Sensational claims often appear in:
Social media posts and videos without credible sourcing
Exaggerated headlines on unverified pages
Speculative political commentary passed as news
These can mislead audiences into believing there’s an official or legal reality behind them when there isn’t.
Rule of thumb: If major news organizations like Reuters, AP, BBC, NY Times, etc. aren’t confirming it, treat a “breaking” claim with skepticism.
🧠 Summary
Claim
Verified?
Notes
Emergency session of Congress to remove Trump
❌
No credible reporting from reliable news outlets
Supreme Court considering Trump legal challenges
✔️
True, involving Federal Reserve firing attempt
Buffett responding to Trump removal
❌
No verified Buffett statements tied to a removal event
Trump at immediate risk of removal
❌
No constitutional process currently confirmed