JUST IN: Bad Bunny Files Stunning $500 Million Lawsuit Against Donald Trump, Claiming The President’s Super Bowl LX Halftime Remarks Were Made With “Actual Malice” and it’s Causing Severe Reputation Damage

In a shocking turn of events following the Super Bowl LX halftime show, global music icon Bad Bunny has reportedly filed a $500 million lawsuit against former U.S. President Donald Trump, accusing him of making defamatory remarks “with actual malice” that caused severe damage to the artist’s reputation.

According to early reports, the lawsuit stems from Trump’s highly publicized criticism of Bad Bunny’s historic halftime performance, which celebrated Latin culture and unity. Trump allegedly described the show as “a disgrace to America” and “a complete embarrassment,” sparking a wave of online backlash and political debate.
Bad Bunny’s legal team claims that Trump’s remarks were not merely opinions but “malicious attacks aimed at undermining the artist’s integrity, cultural message, and global influence.” The filing reportedly cites “actual malice” — a legal term meaning the statements were made knowing they were false or with reckless disregard for the truth.
The lawsuit seeks $500 million in compensatory and punitive damages, claiming that Trump’s words sparked harassment, brand withdrawal discussions, and reputational harm to the Grammy-winning performer.
Bad Bunny, whose real name is Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio, made history as the first solo Latino artist to headline a Super Bowl halftime show — a performance praised worldwide for its cultural depth and message of inclusivity. However, Trump’s comments quickly polarized public opinion, turning the moment into a political flashpoint.
In a brief statement, a representative for Bad Bunny said, “Freedom of expression does not protect calculated defamation. No one is above accountability.”
As of now, Trump has not officially responded to the lawsuit, but insiders expect his legal team to push back aggressively, likely citing First Amendment protections and political opinion defenses.
Legal experts say this could become one of the most high-profile defamation cases involving a former U.S. president and a global artist, potentially setting a new precedent for public figure disputes in the social-media era.
The case is developing — updates will follow as new details emerge.