🔥 TRUMP GRANTED ASYLUM to the DC SHOOTER — a stunning decision now exploding into national outrage! The nation is reeling after revelations that Ramanula Lakanawal—the suspect accused of shooting two National Guardsmen in Washington, D.C.—was granted asylum by the Trump administration just months ago. His approval in April 2025 now sits at the center of a political firestorm, raising urgent questions about vetting failures and who is truly responsible. As Trump scrambles to shift blame onto Biden, the timeline tells a very different story—one that threatens to unravel the former president’s narrative. With investigations intensifying and the public demanding answers, this shocking twist is poised to…See more ⤵️

The United States is in shock tonight after explosive revelations confirmed that Ramanula Lakanawal — the suspect accused of opening fire on two National Guardsmen in Washington, D.C. — was granted asylum by the Trump administration just months before the attack.

According to leaked federal documents obtained by investigative reporters, Lakanawal’s asylum case was approved in April 2025 under a special fast-track policy introduced during Trump’s final months in office. The approval, which bypassed multiple security reviews, is now at the center of a nationwide political firestorm.

“This should never have happened,” one senior DHS official told reporters. “There were red flags — and they were ignored.”

The revelation has triggered outrage across party lines, with lawmakers demanding to know how a high-risk individual passed background checks and entered the country under a supposedly strict immigration framework.

Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump is scrambling to shift blame, accusing President Biden of mishandling follow-up security protocols. But the timeline tells a different story — one that places the asylum approval squarely under Trump’s own directives.

Political analysts warn that this could become one of the most damaging controversies to hit the former president in years, raising urgent questions about his administration’s asylum vetting and decision-making.

As investigations intensify and new details emerge by the hour, one thing is clear — this case has shaken public trust in immigration oversight and reignited fierce debate over accountability, safety, and political truth.