Connect with us

CELEBRITIES

đŸ”„ “WHAT ARE YOU HIDING, TUCKER?!” — Gavin Newsom FILES $787 Million LAWSUIT Over Fox News’ FALSE ‘T.r.u!.m.p Call’ CLAIM,What began as a routine TV segment exploded when Gavin Newsom slammed Fox News’ Tucker Carlson for airing a false story about a private call between Newsom and D.0.n.@.l.d T.r.u!.m.p. Carlson’s claim quickly backfired, and Newsom fired back with a $787 million defamation lawsuit.“You can’t just make up conversations,” Newsom said, challenging Carlson’s credibility and demanding answers. Now, Fox insiders fear the lawsuit could uncover massive lies at the network. 👇 Full breakdown, why this legal battle could shake the media world to its core —

Published

on

 

What Happened: The Core of the Dispute

1. Newsom Sues Fox for Defamation

California Governor Gavin Newsom filed a $787 million defamation lawsuit against Fox News, centering on its coverage of a phone call between him and former President Donald Trump.

 

 

 

The lawsuit was filed in Delaware Superior Court, where Fox Corp is incorporated.

2. The Disputed Trump-Newsom Call

According to Newsom, he spoke with Trump for about 16 minutes late on June 6, or early June 7, depending on time zones.

But Trump publicly said (on June 10) that he had spoken to Newsom “a day ago,” implying a call on June 9.

Newsom strongly denied Trump’s version: “There was no call. Not even a voicemail.”

3. Fox News’ Coverage

On Jesse Watters Primetime, Fox aired a segment that Newsom says was deceptively edited: they cut Trump’s remarks in a way that hid important context.

The chyron (on-screen text) during Watters’s broadcast said: “Gavin Lied About Trump’s Call.”

Watters also questioned Newsom’s integrity:

> “Why would Newsom lie and claim Trump never called him?”

4. Newsom’s Legal Ask & Conditions

He’s demanding $787 million in punitive damages.

He also wants a retraction of the false claims and a formal, on-air apology from Watters and Fox.

If Fox does that, Newsom says he’ll drop the case.

5. Fox News Pushback

Fox called the lawsuit a “transparent publicity stunt 
 designed to chill free speech critical of him.”

They filed a motion to dismiss, arguing among other things that:

Watters’s comment about Newsom “lying” was opinion, based on disclosed facts — thus protected by the First Amendment.

Fox argues Newsom did, in fact, have a call with Trump (on June 6 or 7), so saying he “lied” is not totally false.

They also claim Newsom cannot prove actual malice, i.e., that Fox knowingly made false statements or acted recklessly about their truth.

🧭 Why It’s Such a Big Deal

1. Echoes the Dominion Case

The $787 million sum is not random: it’s nearly the same amount Fox paid to Dominion Voting Systems in 2023 after another defamation case.

By invoking that number, Newsom is signaling: this isn’t just a PR fight — he’s serious about accountability.

2. Reputation & Political Risk

Newsom argues that Fox’s coverage damaged his credibility and political standing.

Because of his role and visibility, this could influence public perception on national security issues, governance, and media trust.

3. Media Accountability

If Newsom wins, it could set a bigger precedent for media outlets facing consequences for distorting or editing content to push a political narrative.

Raises questions about journalistic ethics: Did Fox properly verify dates and context? Did they act with “actual malice”?

4. Legal Challenges

Proving defamation as a public figure is hard: Newsom must show that Fox knew it was false (or had reckless disregard) — that’s a steep bar.

Fox’s defense leans heavily on First Amendment protections, especially for on-air commentary and opinions.

If the case goes to discovery, internal Fox documents could come to light. Newsom hinted: “Discovery will be fun. See you in court, buddy.”

5. Political Power Play

Newsom is not just fighting Fox; he’s challenging a powerful conservative media machine that has defended Trump.

He frames this as part of a broader “fight against their propaganda machine.”

If he wins, any damages could go to anti-Trump causes, per his legal team.

🔍 Risks & Possible Outcomes

If Newsom Wins Big:

Massive reputational blow to Fox News.

Potential deterrent for media companies airing misleading or manipulated content.

Validation (for Newsom) that media must be held accountable; could boost his political profile.

If Fox Wins / Gets Dismissal:

They defend their role as a “news” + commentary network.

Signal that high-profile figures cannot easily sue for defamation just because coverage is critical.

Legal costs for Newsom, especially if he fails to prove “actual malice.”

Settlement Possibility:

Newsom is open to dropping the suit if Fox issues a retraction & apology.

A negotiated settlement could be off-court, but the pressure is real: discovery could expose internal Fox strategies.

💬 Why This Headlines as: “WHAT ARE YOU HIDING, TUCKER?!” is Kind of a Misnomer

Tucker Carlson Isn’t Central: Interestingly, Tucker Carlson is not named in the lawsuit — the suit targets Jesse Watters and Fox more broadly.

The dramatized “What are you hiding, Tucker?!” framing may be more for provocation than legal accuracy — but it taps into the larger narrative: Is Fox covering up for Trump?

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CELEBRITIES4 hours ago

🚹 T.R.U.M.P’S TRADE WAR BACKFIRES: Canada Rejects 175 Million U.S. Eggs – U.S. Farms in Total Chaos! đŸ˜± Massive shipments turned back at border, sparking “unthinkable crisis” in Washington. USDA insider panics: “Our export plan destroyed!” Farms drowning in losses, prices crash, supply chain on brink as Canada switches to Europe. Expert: “U.S. no longer default supplier – all thanks to tariffs!” 👇 This sudden rejection has handed Canada unexpected leverage — and why the U.S. may struggle to claw it back is now unfolding below. 👇

CELEBRITIES5 hours ago

Trump BLINDSIDED by JUDGE over Ballroom FROM HELL. A federal judge appears ready to halt construction of Donald Trump’s massive new “golden ballroom” at the White House, and the story is far bigger than a building dispute. During a high-stakes hearing before Judge Royce Lamberth, serious concerns emerged about secret funding, lack of congressional approval, and the construction of a new underground bunker beneath the East Wing. Read More —

CELEBRITIES5 hours ago

🚹JUST IN: 15 MINUTES AGO — Jack Smith Unveils UNDENIABLE Evidence, and T.r.u.m.p’s Lawyers Are in a PANIC.đŸ”„ Walking into a Republican-controlled House Judiciary Committee, Jack Smith calmly shattered the “witch hunt” narrative and put everything on the record. In his opening statement, Smith declared: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President T.r.u.m.p engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power.” Smith told lawmakers that T.r.u.m.p broke the law, attempted to overturn the election, and would do so again if given the chance…..Full details below👀 —

CELEBRITIES12 hours ago

JUST IN: NO NEED TO WAIT FOR CONGRESS: FEDERAL JUDGES HOLD THE POWER TO SEND TRUMP STRAIGHT TO JAIL AS SEVEN ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT DROP ON THE SAME DAY One sitting U.S. president. Seven articles of impeachment. And rare warnings from federal judges about the possibility of facing consequences never before seen……full details —

CELEBRITIES13 hours ago

🚹 BREAKING NOW:Trump PANICS as Jack Smith Makes the Move He Tried to STOP — His Last-Minute Plea Is FLATLY IGNORED 👇 Read the explosive filing shaking Washington right now —

CELEBRITIES14 hours ago

🚹 TRUMP HUMILIATED IN COURT — Judge Reads the Ruling He Tried to BURY
 and It’s BAD ⚡ 👉 Watch What Happens Next 👇

CELEBRITIES16 hours ago

Trump EXPLODES as Lawmakers DEMAND His RESIGNATION — His Social Media POSTS Spark a NATIONWIDE FIRESTORM! The first post appeared without warning, dropped into the digital bloodstream of the country with the force of a detonator. Then came another. And another. Within minutes, the tone shifted from defiant to furious, from combative to incendiary. Donald J. Trump had taken to social media, and the country could feel it. At the same time, inside the marble corridors of power, lawmakers were no longer whispering. They were demanding. Calls for Trump’s resignation, once confined to fringe corners of political discourse, were now being voiced openly, forcefully, and repeatedly. The convergence of these two forces—Trump’s online eruption and lawmakers’ escalating pressure—ignited a national moment that few were prepared to contain. This was not a slow burn. This was an explosion. This is no longer just about what was said — but about what it triggered. Do you think these posts changed the trajectory of the crisis, or merely exposed what was already there?…full details —

CELEBRITIES20 hours ago

đŸ”„ “UNBEARABLE”: Sir Rod Stewart TORCHES “Draft Dodger” Trump for Insulting Fallen NATO Heroes — Watch the Salute That Shut Him Down 👇

CELEBRITIES20 hours ago

đŸ’„ BREAKING NEWS: JACK SMITH PUBLICLY DUMPS ALL TRUMP FILES 40 MINUTES AGO — Shocking Uploads Ignite Panic in Washington as Secrets Spill! In a shocking turn that detonated through D.C., Special Counsel Jack Smith unleashed every Trump-linked file in his arsenal—publicly uploading explosive materials that sent Jim Jordan and Donald Trump into reported frenzy, scrambling for cover. T.r.u.m.p’s camp froze in stunned silence, firing off furious denials while Smith stood defiant on transparency; backlash surged as allies screamed “witch hunt,” but fans can’t believe this unfiltered dump just exposed the overlooked detail—hidden links to Vance and Jan. 6 horrors, hinting at deeper indictments still brewing.👇

CELEBRITIES22 hours ago

🚹JUST IN: 5 MINUTES AGO: The most important moment of Jack Smith’s deposition reveals Trump’s involvement in the January 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol. “He was getting calls from people he trusts there, people he relies on to cause the riot, and he still refused to come to the aid of the people at the Capitol. That’s very important evidence of criminal intent in our case, and that is what I’m revealing to you.” JACK SMITH also said: “We had proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election, prevent the peaceful transfer of power, retain classified documents, and obstruct justice. I would charge an ex-president again, regardless of party.” Watch all eight hours of Jack Smith’s closed-door deposition.👇👇

CELEBRITIES1 day ago

🚹 BREAKING: CONGRESS IN FULL PANIC MODE — Members RUSH to ERASE Digital Trails After Jack Smith DROPS Trump Phone Records đŸ’„ 👉 Click to see what they’re scrambling to hide

CELEBRITIES1 day ago

đŸ”„ BREAKING: TRUMP ATTACKS JIMMY KIMMEL’S CREDIBILITY — REGRETS IT BEFORE THE APPLAUSE EVEN ENDS ⚡ It was instant late-night chaos when Donald Trump went after Jimmy Kimmel on live TV, sneering at his credibility and trying to bully his way through the moment. The jab was supposed to dominate the room — instead, it backfired spectacularly. Kimmel didn’t flinch. With a calm grin, he lined up Trump’s own words like hard receipts, then delivered a sharp, perfectly timed response that flipped the entire exchange. One line landed — and the studio froze. A beat of silence
 then roaring laughter and applause erupted. Kimmel piled on with rapid-fire punchlines, dismantling Trump’s claims, ego, and public meltdowns in real time. The crowd sensed it immediately: the power had shifted. Trump was cornered — visibly rattled, with nowhere to go. According to insiders, Trump was watching live — and completely LOST IT. One source says he “went ballistic,” pacing, shouting, and demanding consequences as the applause was still echoing. The meltdown reportedly stretched on long after the show ended. The clip has since exploded online, with millions calling it “a flawless late-night takedown.” Commentators agree: Kimmel didn’t just defend himself — he made Trump crack. 👇 The Kimmel moment is now trending worldwide — watch the viral exchange that turned Trump’s attack into instant regret before it disappears
 đŸ‘‡đŸ”„

Copyright © 2024 UKtalkin